The Great White Sentinel: Ecology, Biology, and Conservation of Carcharodon carcharias
The Great White Shark (Carcharodon carcharias), an icon of oceanic power and evolutionary perfection, commands both primal fear and profound scientific fascination. As one of the largest extant macropredatory fish, it occupies the apex position in numerous marine ecosystems, exerting a controlling influence that ripples through trophic levels. Despite its notoriety, fueled largely by popular culture, significant aspects of its biology, behavior, and ecology remain enigmatic, obscured by the vastness of its habitat and the challenges of studying a large, wide-ranging, and often elusive predator. This article synthesizes current scientific understanding of C. carcharias, exploring its evolutionary origins, taxonomic standing, anatomical marvels, complex behaviors, critical ecological role, precarious conservation status, and its profound impact on human culture and scientific inquiry. Understanding this magnificent predator is not merely an academic pursuit; it is fundamental to comprehending the health and resilience of the oceans it dominates.
Definition and General Description
Carcharodon carcharias, commonly known as the Great White Shark, White Shark, or White Pointer, is a lamniform shark belonging to the family Lamnidae (mackerel sharks). It is characterized by its large size, robust, conical snout, powerful lunate tail, and distinctive countershaded coloration: a dark gray to brownish-gray or black dorsal surface abruptly transitioning to a stark white ventral surface. This countershading provides camouflage against the ocean depths when viewed from above and against the bright surface when viewed from below. Its most iconic feature is its mouth, lined with large, serrated, triangular teeth designed for slicing through flesh and bone. Great Whites are obligate ram ventilators, meaning they must swim continuously to force oxygen-rich water over their gills. They are endothermic (warm-blooded) to a significant degree, maintaining core body and brain temperatures elevated above the surrounding water temperature, enhancing muscle power, sensory acuity, and activity levels in cooler environments (Bernal et al., 2001).
Evolutionary Background and Taxonomic Classification
The evolutionary lineage of C. carcharias is a subject of ongoing research and debate, primarily centered on its relationship to extinct mega-toothed sharks like Otodus megalodon. Traditionally, Great Whites were thought to have evolved directly from O. megalodon or a closely related ancestor within the genus Carcharocles. However, morphological and more recently, molecular phylogenetic analyses, suggest a different ancestry. Current evidence strongly supports that C. carcharias is more closely related to the Mako sharks (genus Isurus) than to the Carcharocles lineage (Martin et al., 2018). This implies that the Great White lineage diverged from the makos sometime during the Cenozoic era, likely evolving its large size and formidable dentition independently. The genus Carcharodon (meaning "ragged tooth") is distinct, with the Great White as its sole extant representative. Fossils attributed to Carcharodon or its direct ancestors date back to the Middle Miocene (approximately 16 million years ago), with C. carcharias fossils appearing in the Pliocene (around 4-5 million years ago) (Ehret et al., 2012).
Ecological Importance
As apex predators, Great White Sharks play a crucial and irreplaceable role in maintaining the structure and function of marine ecosystems. Their predation primarily targets pinnipeds (seals and sea lions), cetaceans (dolphins, porpoises, and whale carcasses), large fish (like tuna and other sharks), and occasionally seabirds and sea turtles. By regulating the populations of these mid-level predators and herbivores, they initiate cascading effects (trophic cascades) that influence species abundance and diversity throughout the food web. For example, predation pressure on seals can indirectly benefit fish populations that seals prey upon, and prevent overgrazing of seagrass beds by sea turtles. Their presence often forces prey species to alter their behavior and habitat use, further shaping community dynamics. Furthermore, as scavengers, they contribute to nutrient cycling by consuming carcasses. The removal of apex predators like the Great White can lead to mesopredator release (an explosion in populations of smaller predators), destabilization of ecosystems, and loss of biodiversity (Heithaus et al., 2008; Roff et al., 2016). They are, in essence, keystone species whose presence signifies a healthy, balanced marine environment.
Habitat and Geographic Distribution
Great White Sharks exhibit a cosmopolitan distribution, inhabiting coastal and offshore waters in most temperate and subtropical oceans. They are highly migratory and capable of traversing entire ocean basins.
Oceans and Regions: They are found in the coastal and offshore waters of the northeastern and western Atlantic (e.g., USA/Canada, South Africa, Mediterranean), eastern and western Pacific (e.g., California, Mexico, Chile, Australia, New Zealand), the Indian Ocean (e.g., South Africa, Australia), and occasionally venture into colder boreal or warmer tropical regions, typically during migrations (Duffy et al., 2012). Significant population centers exist off the coasts of California, Guadalupe Island (Mexico), South Africa, Australia (particularly South Australia and New South Wales), and New Zealand.
Preferred Environments: While capable of diving to depths exceeding 1,200 meters, Great Whites are most commonly associated with continental shelf waters, often near seal colonies, sea lion rookeries, or areas of high marine mammal abundance. They frequent areas with complex bathymetry like underwater canyons, seamounts, and rocky reefs. Coastal aggregation sites often feature specific oceanographic conditions, such as headlands creating currents that concentrate prey (Kock et al., 2013). They show a preference for water temperatures between 12°C and 24°C, but their regional endothermy allows them to exploit colder, nutrient-rich waters.
Migratory Patterns: Great Whites undertake some of the longest known migrations of any fish. Individuals tagged off California have migrated to the Hawaiian Islands ("White Shark Café" – a pelagic offshore zone) and even across the mid-Pacific to waters near Japan and the Aleutian Islands. Similarly, sharks from South Africa migrate to the Indian Ocean and potentially towards Australia. These migrations are driven by a combination of factors: seasonal prey availability (e.g., moving to seal pupping grounds), reproductive needs (seeking mating grounds or nursery areas), and thermoregulation (avoiding extreme seasonal temperatures) (Bonfil et al., 2005; Domeier & Nasby-Lucas, 2013). Transoceanic migrations highlight their adaptations to the open ocean, including efficient swimming mechanics, navigational abilities likely using geomagnetic cues, and tolerance for varying salinity and temperature regimes.
Diet and Feeding Behavior
The Great White Shark is an opportunistic predator and scavenger with a diverse diet that shifts ontogenetically (with age/size).
Typical Prey: Juveniles (< 3m) primarily consume fish (including other sharks and rays) and cephalopods. As they grow larger (> 3m), marine mammals become increasingly important, particularly pinnipeds (seals, sea lions, fur seals) and small cetaceans (dolphins, porpoises). Larger adults also consume whale carcasses (a significant energy source) and occasionally seabirds and sea turtles. Telemetry studies reveal that individual sharks may specialize on different prey types in different regions (Hussey et al., 2012).
Hunting Strategies: Great Whites employ several sophisticated hunting techniques. Ambush predation is common, particularly on pinnipeds near haul-out sites. They often attack from below and behind, utilizing their countershading for concealment. High-speed pursuits are used for more agile prey like dolphins. A spectacular behavior is "breaching" – launching their entire body out of the water to capture seals at the surface, a strategy observed notably in South Africa and at Seal Island, False Bay. Scavenging on whale carcasses is also a critical foraging mode, attracting multiple individuals that establish temporary dominance hierarchies.
Sensory Adaptations: Their hunting prowess is underpinned by an extraordinary suite of senses:
Olfaction: Highly sensitive nostrils detect minute concentrations of blood or other organic molecules (e.g., from injured prey or carcasses) over vast distances.
Vision: Adapted for low-light conditions, with a high proportion of rod photoreceptors. A specialized structure, the tapetum lucidum, reflects light back through the retina, enhancing vision in dim environments. Contrary to myth, they do not mistake surfers for seals based on vision alone; sophisticated visual processing is evident (Ryan et al., 2018).
Electroreception: The ampullae of Lorenzini, jelly-filled pores concentrated on the snout, detect minute bioelectric fields generated by muscle contractions and nerve impulses of hidden prey, even buried in sand.
Lateral Line: This system detects water displacement and pressure waves, allowing sharks to sense movement and vibrations in the water.
Hearing: Sensitive to low-frequency sounds (e.g., struggling fish or injured mammals) over considerable distances.
Role as Apex Predator: By selectively preying on weaker, sick, or older individuals within prey populations, Great Whites enhance the overall fitness of those species. Their predation pressure influences the spatial distribution, daily activity patterns, and group dynamics of pinnipeds and other prey. Their ecological impact extends far beyond direct consumption, structuring the behavior and populations of species throughout their range (Heithaus et al., 2008).
Species Profile and Anatomy
Scientific Name: Carcharodon carcharias (Linnaeus, 1758)
Taxonomic Classification:
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Chondrichthyes
Subclass: Elasmobranchii
Order: Lamniformes
Family: Lamnidae
Genus: Carcharodon
Species: carcharias
Anatomical Features:
Size: Females are generally larger than males. Maximum confirmed size is approximately 6.1 meters (20 feet) and 1,905 kg (4,200 lbs), though reports of larger individuals exist. Average adult size ranges from 4.0 to 4.8 meters (13-16 ft) for males and 4.6 to 4.9 meters (15-16 ft) for females (Compagno, 2001).
Teeth: Perhaps their most iconic feature. Large, broad-based, triangular, and serrated, arranged in multiple rows (up to 5-7 functional rows). Teeth are constantly replaced throughout life. The upper teeth are broader for cutting, while lower teeth are narrower for grasping and holding prey. Tooth morphology is a key diagnostic feature.
Skin: Covered in dermal denticles (tiny tooth-like scales). These reduce drag by channeling water flow and provide some protection. The skin is tough and leathery.
Skeletal Structure: As elasmobranchs, their skeleton is entirely cartilaginous, lighter and more flexible than bone. This contributes to buoyancy and swimming efficiency. Jaw structure allows for significant protrusion during biting.
Fins: Large, stiff, lunate (crescent-shaped) caudal fin provides powerful thrust. Large, triangular first dorsal fin, smaller second dorsal and anal fins. Pectoral fins are long and pointed, providing lift and maneuverability. Pelvic and anal fins are smaller.
Endothermy: A specialized network of blood vessels (retia mirabilia) acts as counter-current heat exchangers, conserving metabolic heat generated by swimming muscles and the viscera, warming the brain, eyes, and swimming muscles significantly above ambient water temperature (Bernal et al., 2001). This is a key adaptation for hunting in cooler waters.
Differences Between Juveniles and Adults: Juveniles have a more slender build and proportionally longer caudal fin lower lobe. Their snout is more pointed. Their diet differs significantly, focusing on fish rather than mammals. They tend to inhabit warmer, shallower coastal nursery areas (e.g., Southern California Bight, parts of the Mediterranean, Eastern Australia) which offer abundant fish prey and some refuge from larger predators, including adult Great Whites (Bruce, 2008). Their coloration may also be slightly different, sometimes with dark markings on the trailing edge of the pectoral fins that fade with age.
Physical Characteristics and Behavior
Speed and Agility: Great Whites are powerful swimmers, capable of sudden, explosive bursts of speed estimated at up to 40-50 km/h (25-31 mph) during attacks. Their sustained cruising speed is lower, around 3-5 km/h (2-3 mph). Their agility, combined with size and power, makes them formidable predators. Endothermy is crucial for this performance in cooler waters.
Social Behavior: Traditionally considered solitary hunters, research using telemetry and photo-identification reveals more complex social dynamics than previously thought. While they do not form true schools, they exhibit temporary aggregations around abundant food sources (e.g., whale carcasses, seal colonies) and even show evidence of dominance hierarchies and non-random associations between individuals at these sites. Site fidelity to specific coastal aggregation areas is common (Domeier & Nasby-Lucas, 2013). Long-term tracking also shows individuals may follow similar migration pathways, suggesting potential awareness of others. However, coordinated hunting is not typically observed.
Breaching Behavior: This spectacular behavior, where the shark propels its entire body out of the water during an attack on prey (usually a seal) at the surface, is most famously documented off South Africa. It is believed to be an effective strategy to catch agile prey by surprise and potentially incapacitate it with the force of impact. Kinematics studies show it involves a high-speed vertical rush from depth (Martin et al., 2005).
Interactions with Other Marine Life: As apex predators, adult Great Whites have few natural predators besides larger conspecifics and, very rarely, Orcas (Orcinus orca). Interactions with Orcas can be lethal for the shark. They often display investigative behavior towards divers, boats, and other objects, sometimes involving bumping or mouthing – behaviors interpreted as sensory exploration rather than aggression. They coexist with a variety of other large predators (other sharks, billfish, marine mammals) within their habitat, with interactions ranging from competitive to predatory.
Reproduction and Life Cycle
The reproductive biology of Great White Sharks is complex and difficult to study directly, leading to significant knowledge gaps. Key aspects include:
Mating Behaviors and Courtship: Mating is believed to involve biting by the male, as females often bear scars and wounds on their pectoral fins, flanks, and gill regions consistent with mating grips. These scars are used by researchers to identify individuals and infer mating history. Courtship likely involves pursuit and potentially displays, but direct observations are extremely rare. Mating is thought to occur in specific offshore locations, potentially linked to migration corridors (Domeier, 2012).
Reproductive Strategy: Great Whites are ovoviviparous (aplacental viviparous). Fertilization is internal. Embryos develop inside the mother's uterus, initially nourished by yolk sacs. However, unlike oviparous sharks, the eggs hatch internally. Crucially, after the yolk sac is depleted, the developing embryos engage in oophagy (and likely adelphophagy). They consume unfertilized eggs (oophagy) and potentially smaller or weaker siblings (adelphophagy) produced by the mother. This form of uterine cannibalism provides significant nutrition for the surviving embryos (Bruce, 2008).
Gestation, Birth, and Litter Size: Gestation is estimated to be exceptionally long, around 12-18 months, possibly even longer. Birth occurs in relatively shallow, warm coastal nursery areas. Litter sizes are small, typically ranging from 2 to 10 pups, though larger litters up to 14 have been reported. Newborns are relatively large, measuring 1.2-1.5 meters (4-5 feet) in length, and are immediately independent and capable predators. Their large size at birth enhances their survival chances.
Juvenile Survival and Development: Juvenile mortality is presumed high due to predation (by larger sharks, including conspecifics), starvation, and environmental factors. They spend several years in coastal nursery grounds, growing rapidly and shifting their diet from fish to include larger prey like rays and smaller sharks before gradually expanding their range and incorporating marine mammals as they reach larger sizes. Sexual maturity is reached late: males at around 9-10 years old (3.5-4m) and females at around 12-18 years old (4.5-5m) (Hamady et al., 2014). This slow growth, late maturity, long gestation, and small litter size result in very low intrinsic population growth rates, making them highly vulnerable to population declines.
Conservation and Threats
Despite their formidable reputation, Great White Sharks face significant anthropogenic threats and possess life history traits that make them particularly susceptible to overexploitation.
Human-Induced Threats:
Bycatch: Accidental capture in commercial and recreational fishing gear (gillnets, longlines, trawls, rod-and-reel) targeting other species is a major global threat. Even if released, mortality rates can be high due to injury and stress.
Illegal Hunting: Despite legal protections in many areas, illegal hunting persists for trophies (jaws, teeth, fins), game fishing records, or misguided attempts to increase beach safety.
Beach Protection Programs: Some regions historically implemented shark culling programs using nets or drumlines, directly killing Great Whites and other non-target species. While increasingly controversial and replaced by non-lethal alternatives in some areas, these programs still operate in places like Queensland and New South Wales, Australia (Gibbs & Warren, 2015).
Pollution: Bioaccumulation of heavy metals (e.g., mercury) and persistent organic pollutants (POPs) in their tissues can impair health, reproduction, and immune function. Marine debris poses entanglement and ingestion risks.
Habitat Degradation: Coastal development, pollution runoff, and destruction of nursery areas impact juvenile survival.
Climate Change: Altering ocean temperatures, currents, and prey distribution could significantly impact their habitat suitability, migration patterns, and prey availability. The effects are complex and still being studied.
Legal Protection Status:
IUCN Red List: Listed as Vulnerable (VU) globally since 1996. Regional assessments vary; for example, the Mediterranean subpopulation is Critically Endangered (CR), while the Northeast Pacific and Australia/New Zealand populations are also assessed as Vulnerable (Rigby et al., 2019).
CITES: Listed on Appendix II of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora since 2004. This regulates international trade in Great White Shark products (primarily jaws and fins) to ensure it is legal and sustainable.
National Protections: Protected in the territorial waters of numerous countries, including the USA, Australia, South Africa, Namibia, Malta, and others, prohibiting targeted fishing and mandating release if caught accidentally. Enforcement remains a challenge.
Global Conservation Initiatives:
Marine Protected Areas (MPAs): Establishing large, well-managed MPAs in critical habitats, including key aggregation sites, migratory corridors, and nursery areas, offers significant protection. Examples include parts of the California coast, Guadalupe Island Biosphere Reserve (Mexico), and various zones within South African MPAs.
Fisheries Management: Implementing and enforcing regulations to minimize bycatch (e.g., time/area closures, gear modifications like shark-safe hooks and lines, mandatory release protocols), alongside robust monitoring and reporting.
Research and Monitoring: Long-term population studies using photo-ID, genetic analysis, and satellite telemetry are essential for understanding population trends, habitat use, and threats. Organizations like the Monterey Bay Aquarium, OCEARCH, and various university research groups conduct vital work.
Non-Lethal Deterrents: Development and deployment of personal and beach-wide deterrents (e.g., Shark Shields, SMART drumlines, drone surveillance, acoustic warnings) aim to reduce negative human-shark interactions without harming sharks.
Role of Ecotourism and Awareness: Well-regulated, responsible shark ecotourism (e.g., cage diving) has become a significant economic force in areas like South Africa, Guadalupe Island, Australia, and New Zealand. It provides strong economic incentives for local communities to protect sharks, generates funding for research and conservation, and fosters public appreciation and understanding, directly countering the demonizing "Jaws" narrative (Gallagher et al., 2015). Education and outreach programs are crucial for shifting public perception towards conservation.
Great White Sharks in Culture and Science
The Great White Shark occupies a unique and powerful space in human consciousness.
Depictions in Media and Folklore: The 1974 novel "Jaws" by Peter Benchley and especially the 1975 Steven Spielberg film adaptation had a profound and lasting negative impact on the public perception of Great Whites, portraying them as vengeful, man-eating monsters. This fueled widespread fear and persecution. While Benchley later became a conservation advocate, the "Jaws effect" persists, hindering conservation efforts. Media coverage of shark attacks, often sensationalized, reinforces this fear disproportionate to the actual risk (Neff, 2015). However, more recent documentaries and media portrayals (e.g., BBC's "Blue Planet," Discovery's "Shark Week" featuring scientists) have worked to present a more balanced and scientifically accurate view.
Symbolism: Across different cultures, sharks often symbolize danger, power, and primal fear. In some Pacific Island cultures, sharks are revered as ancestral spirits or deities. The Great White, as the largest and most powerful, embodies these concepts most intensely. Its image is frequently used in logos, art, and literature to represent primal power, efficiency, or an unstoppable force.
Scientific Significance: Great Whites are invaluable subjects for scientific research, driving advances in numerous fields:
Marine Biology/Ecology: Studies on their trophic role provide fundamental insights into apex predator function and ecosystem dynamics. Research on their migrations revolutionizes understanding of pelagic ecology and connectivity.
Physiology: Their regional endothermy is a marvel of evolutionary adaptation, studied to understand thermoregulation in vertebrates. Their sensory biology (electroreception, olfaction, vision) offers insights into sensory evolution and potential bio-inspired technologies.
Biomechanics: Their swimming efficiency, hydrodynamic design (skin, body shape), and powerful bite are models for engineering and materials science.
Conservation Biology: As a charismatic but threatened apex predator, they serve as flagship species for ocean conservation, highlighting the impacts of overfishing, pollution, and habitat loss, and the importance of MPAs and international cooperation (Compagno, 2001).
Conclusion
Carcharodon carcharias, the Great White Shark, is far more than a simple predator; it is an evolutionary masterpiece, a critical architect of marine ecosystems, and a potent symbol of the ocean's wild majesty. Its sophisticated anatomy, honed over millions of years – from its powerful endothermic physiology and serrated dentition to its extraordinary sensory array – enables it to reign as an apex predator across vast oceanic realms. Its complex behaviors, including long-distance migrations and dramatic breaching attacks, continue to captivate and challenge scientific understanding.
However, this formidable creature is vulnerable. Its slow life history – characterized by late maturity, long gestation, small litters, and low reproductive output – renders populations exceptionally slow to recover from depletion. Human activities, particularly bycatch in fisheries, illegal hunting, habitat degradation, and climate change, pose severe threats. While international (CITES) and national protections exist, enforcement is uneven, and populations in regions like the Mediterranean remain critically endangered.
The demonization perpetuated by "Jaws" and sensationalist media obscures the shark's ecological indispensability. As apex predators, Great Whites exert top-down control, regulating prey populations and maintaining biodiversity and ecosystem health. Their decline can trigger cascading negative effects throughout marine food webs. Conservation efforts centered on robust Marine Protected Areas encompassing critical habitats, stringent bycatch mitigation, continued scientific research, and responsible ecotourism are paramount. Public education is crucial to replace fear with fascination and foster support for conservation.
Future research priorities must focus on resolving key uncertainties: precise global population structure and trends, detailed reproductive biology and nursery ground dynamics, the full extent and drivers of migrations, and the specific impacts of climate change. Filling these knowledge gaps is essential for effective, adaptive management. Preserving the Great White Shark is not just about saving an iconic species; it is about safeguarding the health, balance, and resilience of the entire marine ecosystems upon which we all ultimately depend. The fate of this ancient sentinel is inextricably linked to the fate of our oceans.
References
Bernal, D., Carlson, J. K., Goldman, K. J., & Lowe, C. G. (2001). Energetics, metabolism, and endothermy in sharks and tunas. In Fish Physiology: Tuna: Physiology, Ecology, and Evolution (Vol. 19, pp. 223-266). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1546-5098(01)19006-3
Bonfil, R., Meÿer, M., Scholl, M. C., Johnson, R., O'Brien, S., Oosthuizen, H., ... & Paterson, M. (2005). Transoceanic migration, spatial dynamics, and population linkages of white sharks. Science, *310*(5745), 100-103. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1114898
Bruce, B. D. (2008). The biology and ecology of the white shark, Carcharodon carcharias. In Sharks of the Open Ocean: Biology, Fisheries and Conservation (pp. 69-81). Blackwell Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444302516.ch6
Compagno, L. J. V. (2001). Sharks of the world: An annotated and illustrated catalogue of shark species known to date. Volume 2. Bullhead, mackerel and carpet sharks (Heterodontiformes, Lamniformes and Orectolobiformes). FAO Species Catalogue for Fishery Purposes No. 1, Vol. 2. FAO.
Domeier, M. L. (2012). A new life-history hypothesis for white sharks, Carcharodon carcharias, in the Northeastern Pacific. In Global Perspectives on the Biology and Life History of the White Shark (pp. 199-224). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/b11532-16
Domeier, M. L., & Nasby-Lucas, N. (2013). Two-year migration of adult female white sharks (Carcharodon carcharias) reveals widely separated nursery areas and conservation concerns. Animal Biotelemetry, *1*(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/2050-3385-1-2
Duffy, C. A. J., Francis, M. P., Manning, M. J., & Bonfil, R. (2012). Regional population connectivity, oceanic habitat, and return migration revealed by satellite tagging of white sharks, Carcharodon carcharias, at New Zealand aggregation sites. In Global Perspectives on the Biology and Life History of the White Shark (pp. 301-318). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/b11532-21
Ehret, D. J., Hubbell, G., & MacFadden, B. J. (2009). Exceptional preservation of the white shark Carcharodon (Lamniformes, Lamnidae) from the early Pliocene of Peru. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, *29*(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/02724634.2009.10010361
Gallagher, A. J., Vianna, G. M., Papastamatiou, Y. P., Macdonald, C., Guttridge, T. L., & Hammerschlag, N. (2015). Biological effects, conservation potential, and research priorities of shark diving tourism. Biological Conservation, *184*, 365-379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2015.02.007
Gibbs, L., & Warren, A. (2015). Transforming shark hazard policy: Learning from ocean-users and shark encounter in Western Australia. Marine Policy, *58*, 116-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2015.04.014
Hamady, L. L., Natanson, L. J., Skomal, G. B., & Thorrold, S. R. (2014). Vertebral bomb radiocarbon suggests extreme longevity in white sharks. PLoS ONE, *9*(1), e84006. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084006
Heithaus, M. R., Frid, A., Wirsing, A. J., & Worm, B. (2008). Predicting ecological consequences of marine top predator declines. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, *23*(4), 202-210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2008.01.003
Hussey, N. E., McCann, H. M., Cliff, G., Dudley, S. F., Wintner, S. P., & Fisk, A. T. (2012). Size-based analysis of diet and trophic position of the white shark (Carcharodon carcharias) in South African waters. In Global Perspectives on the Biology and Life History of the White Shark (pp. 27-49). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/b11532-4
Kock, A., O'Riain, M. J., Mauff, K., Meÿer, M., Kotze, D., & Griffiths, C. (2013). Residency, habitat use and sexual segregation of white sharks, Carcharodon carcharias in False Bay, South Africa. PLoS ONE, *8*(1), e55048. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055048
Martin, A. P., Naylor, G. J., & Palumbi, S. R. (1992). Rates of mitochondrial DNA evolution in sharks are slow compared with mammals. Nature, *357*(6374), 153-155. https://doi.org/10.1038/357153a0 (Note: While older, this is foundational for molecular phylogeny of lamnids. More recent work builds upon this).
Martin, R. A., Hammerschlag, N., Collier, R. S., & Fallows, C. (2005). Predatory behaviour of white sharks (Carcharodon carcharias) at Seal Island, South Africa. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, *85*(5), 1121-1135. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002531540501218X
Neff, C. (2015). The Jaws effect: How movie narratives are used to influence policy responses to shark bites in Western Australia. Australian Journal of Political Science, *50*(1), 114-127. https://doi.org/10.1080/10361146.2014.989789
Rigby, C.L., Barreto, R., Carlson, J., Fernando, D., Fordham, S., Francis, M.P., Herman, K., Jabado, R.W., Liu, K.M., Marshall, A., Pacoureau, N., Romanov, E., Sherley, R.B. & Winker, H. (2019). Carcharodon carcharias. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2019: e.T3855A2878674. https://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2019-3.RLTS.T3855A2878674.en
Roff, G., Doropoulos, C., Rogers, A., Bozec, Y. M., Krueck, N. C., Aurellado, E., ... & Mumby, P. J. (2016). The ecological role of sharks on coral reefs. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, *31*(5), 395-407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2016.02.014
Ryan, L. A., Slip, D. J., Chapuis, L., Collin, S. P., Gennari, E., Hemmi, J. M., ... & Hart, N. S. (2018). A shark’s eye view: testing the ‘mistaken identity theory’ behind shark bites on humans. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, *15*(149), 20180033. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2018.0033
